Wednesday, February 2, 2011

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2010/sep/24/ed-dadt24-ar-522173/

     This article is by Aaron Belkin in the Richmond Times Dispatch, written on 9/24/2010. Belkin writes in an deduction form. His claim or major premise is that “the law (“Don't Ask, Don't Tell”) undermines unit cohesion, wastes money, and leads to a loss of critical military talent. It is also patently unfair and... unconstitutional.” Belkin supports his claims by debunking a number of myths surrounding the repeal, and why it was created in the first place.
     Belkin lists a number of myths such as: DADT was created to promote unit cohesion and military readiness, repealing DADT will be complicated, and the troops oppose repealing the DADT. The fact that Belkin counter argued these myths with facts and surveys done adds to the credibility and effectiveness of the article.
     The thesis statement for this article could be, This policy is overall a negative thing for the military and it will not be as difficult to abolish as some are saying. Some opposing questions readers may ask, could be along the lines, of how exactly would be the best way to ensure a smooth transition? Or how do they play to ensure unit cohesion is improved?  

2 comments:

  1. I think your analysis in paragraph two is very good. You seem well-informed on the matter. Good work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds great. Very good analysis.

    ReplyDelete